But those that did liked Mr. DeWine. The Plain Dealer, in Cleveland, cited his “experience and practicality.” He has held a long list of government positions, including United States senator, member of the House of Representatives, Ohio attorney general and Ohio lieutenant governor.
The Akron Beacon Journal also endorsed Mr. DeWine. It called him “testy and evasive” but said he had the experience and “capacity to learn” that is required of a successful governor.
But The Vindicator, in Youngstown, excoriated him and declined to make an endorsement in the Republican race. It said it refused to endorse Mr. DeWine because “he dropped the ball on a major public-corruption case” in their city in 2014.
It declined to endorse Ms. Taylor because of her “extreme views” on abortion, Medicaid expansion and gun control. (She opposes all of them.)
On the Democratic side
When faced with the task of endorsing a candidate in the Democratic primary, Ohio’s newspapers did not have many ways to distinguish between Mr. Cordray and Mr. Kucinich.
That turned the question of who to endorse into a matter of style. Should the next governor have a flair for the dramatic, like the liberal fire-starter Mr. Kucinich?
Or should the job go to a sober technocrat, like Mr. Cordray, who spent much of his recent career working on bank regulation?
And does it matter if, like Mr. Kucinich, the next governor had ever taken money from a group linked to Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad?
As The Vindicator’s editorial page said this week, Democratic voters “have an interesting choice to make in the May 8 primary for governor: They can either vote with their hearts or their heads.” (It endorsed Mr. Cordray.)
The only newspaper to endorse Mr. Kucinich was The Cleveland Plain-Dealer, the largest paper in the city he served as mayor from 1978 to 1979 and later as a member of the House of Representatives from 1997 to 2013.
The Plain Dealer cited Ohio’s history of Republican dominance in its endorsement of Mr. Kucinich, who is backed by allies of Senator Bernie Sanders, over Mr. Cordray, who is supported by Senator Elizabeth Warren. “Old habits die hard,” the paper said. “But die they must.”
The paper said voters should back Mr. Kucinich because he had “passion, vision and an ability to grasp the bully pulpit to inspire Ohioans” and could “challenge Statehouse inertia” after decades of Republican governance.
“Business as usual in Columbus has left too many Ohioans behind,” it said. “And a Kucinich governorship wouldn’t be business-as-usual.”
But the editorial board said it is “as aware as any could be of Kucinich’s flaws.” Those include a $20,000 speaking fee the former congressman took last year from a group sympathetic to Mr. Assad. He said recently that he will return the money.
The Akron Beacon Journal appeared to have little patience with both the primary campaign overall (“bizarre and wacky”) and with Mr. Kucinich in particular. Last week, it dismissively said that he had argued that Mr. Cordray “somehow isn’t progressive enough.”
It endorsed Mr. Cordray, who it described as “careful and dullish” and not “a stirring campaigner, to say the least.” But it said he had the sober temperament and skills the state needs in a leader.
“To gain these and other skills takes experience (and the capacity to learn,)” it wrote in its endorsement. “Look no further than the current White House to see what happens when they are missing or in short supply.”