Mr. Dance actively negotiated the terms of a $875,000 no-bid contract between his school district and Supes Academy, a school leadership training service, while he worked for Supes and a related company called Synesi, according to the indictment. Mr. Dance also made false statements on financial disclosure documents, the indictment said, to conceal about $90,000 in earnings from those companies.
The prosecutor also said that Mr. Dance concealed about $12,000 in payments he received through his consulting work in 2015, including $4,600 from an organization called the Education Research and Development Institute — ERDI for short — that pays superintendents to attend meetings with educational tech companies.
As part of its services, ERDI has in the past charged companies $13,000 to facilitate a meeting with five superintendents or other school leaders to discuss products, according to documents obtained by The Times. After Mr. Dance participated in confidential meetings with two of his district’s tech vendors at an ERDI conference last year, the district extended both companies’ contracts.
Officials in Maryland and Ohio have begun looking superintendents’ relationships with ERDI.
Andrew Jay Graham, a lawyer representing Mr. Dance, declined to comment on the case. Mr. Dance faces a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison for each of the four counts against him, according to the indictment.
“We are surprised and saddened to hear about the charges against former superintendent Dallas Dance,” said Verletta White, the interim superintendent in Baltimore County.
Ms. White has admitted to also receiving and failing to report consulting payments from ERDI, saying it had been a mistake. “It is important to note,” she said on Tuesday, “there are no accusations of wrongdoing by the current administration or me.”
In early January, Gov. Larry Hogan said his administration planned to introduce legislation to establish an investigator general within the state’s Department of Education to examine complaints of unethical, unprofessional or illegal conduct related to school district procurement and other matters. In doing so, Mr. Hogan specifically cited “allegations of improprieties and conflicts of interest by both the former and current Baltimore County school superintendent.”
David Sundstrom, ERDI’s president, said the company had not been contacted by the state prosecutor’s office.
“We — along with so many who work to serve students and teachers — are profoundly disheartened and disappointed if these allegations are true,” Mr. Sundstrom wrote in a statement.
An earlier version of this article referred imprecisely to where school superintendents’ relationships with the Education Research and Development Institute, or ERDI, are being scrutinized by state officials. It is in Ohio and Maryland specifically, not around the country.